A quick look at the supporters of this issue reveals a rogues gallery of self interest groups who all derive their existence in part or whole from the public trough - all led by an Erisian COA T.Indeed!
Some of the Greens are pretty wack. Their position explanation uses phrases like "mowing down people in the street". Westwood cares little for other neighborhoods or the city at large. This is the neighborhood that considered secession from the city. The ministers group seems to be the same crew that got called out for being absentee slumlords in WCPO's Visions of Vine Street.
CODE is the city employee union that was concocted by a woman seemingly for the sole purpose of swindling her coworkers. It will be interesting to see how that pedigree effects them in the future. The safety unions don't seem to see the benefit of improving a neighborhood where they frequently risk their lives dealing with vice and abandoned buildings owned by uncaring absentee landlords. Given the low scores of council candidates on the NAACP's scorecard, one has to wonder how relevant the organization is. If their goals are so important, how come next to nobody seems to realize it?
It reminds one of William Burroughs' discussion of Junky Relations. They all need each other but absolutely hate each other because they all are competing for the same supply of junk.
Friday, November 04, 2011
Quimbob Has a Great Take on the Anti-Rail Camp
Quimbob at Blogging Isn't Cool has a thorough summary and analysis of Issue 48 and it's advocates and opposition. His summary of those in-favor of Issue 48 (the anti-rail camp) is succinct and very valid:
Wednesday, November 02, 2011
OTR And MOTR Get BBC News Mention
An interesting political column from a BBC writer with a take on American National Politics from experiences and conversations at MOTR during a show. I don't know why this reporter happened to find his way to OTR, but I hope he find out something interesting. He also has a radio report on political issues from Ohio here.
Tuesday, November 01, 2011
One Week Out: Council Election Preview
We are just one week away from the November General Election and there are things locked up about the election for Cincinnati City Council, but there are seats that are clearly in play. Here's my take on what is locked up and what is in play:
Locked Up Winners:
Roxanne Qualls
Chris Bortz
Heavy Favorites to Win:
Cecil Thomas
Leslie Ghiz
Likely Unless Odd Things Happen:
Charlie Winburn
Laure Quinlivan
In the Mix:
Kevin Flynn
Wayne Lippert
Amy Murray
P.G. Sittenfeld
Wendell Young
Still in the Mix, But With Higher Hurdles:
Mike Allen
Nicholas Hollan
Jason Riveiro
Chris Seelbach
Yvette Simpson
Christopher Smitherman
Out of the Running:
Catherine Smith Mills
Jacqueline Allen
Kathy Atkinson
Patricia McCollum
Sandra Queen Noble
Not that much can change over the next week, except for the turnout. The turnout is expected to be low compared to national election years, but conventional wisdom would indicate that it should compare to what the 2007 council election drew out. I would say the more new voters go to the polls the more likely that non-incumbents will gain votes. It is easy for incumbents to win, but difficult for non-elected incumbents to get on without lots of new support. We have three appointees on council and all three, even with the amounts of money the Republican appointees have, need voter turnout to help them.
Locked Up Winners:
Roxanne Qualls
Chris Bortz
Heavy Favorites to Win:
Cecil Thomas
Leslie Ghiz
Likely Unless Odd Things Happen:
Charlie Winburn
Laure Quinlivan
In the Mix:
Kevin Flynn
Wayne Lippert
Amy Murray
P.G. Sittenfeld
Wendell Young
Still in the Mix, But With Higher Hurdles:
Mike Allen
Nicholas Hollan
Jason Riveiro
Chris Seelbach
Yvette Simpson
Christopher Smitherman
Out of the Running:
Catherine Smith Mills
Jacqueline Allen
Kathy Atkinson
Patricia McCollum
Sandra Queen Noble
Not that much can change over the next week, except for the turnout. The turnout is expected to be low compared to national election years, but conventional wisdom would indicate that it should compare to what the 2007 council election drew out. I would say the more new voters go to the polls the more likely that non-incumbents will gain votes. It is easy for incumbents to win, but difficult for non-elected incumbents to get on without lots of new support. We have three appointees on council and all three, even with the amounts of money the Republican appointees have, need voter turnout to help them.
Sunday, October 30, 2011
Enquirer 2011 Endorsements For Council Are Published
The Enquirer has published it's endorsements for Cincinnati City Council and I will be the first to admit I am surprised and actually fairly pleased with the group they picked. While, this not the group I would pick, the list is far less conservative than in years past. Their list:
Three Dems, two Republicans, four Charterites (including two cross-endorsed as Dems.) That is a whole sale change of government, leaning back to the left from the current council. That's impressive for the traditionally Mainstream Republican editorial board on the Enquirer. I think they changed the process a bit this year, creating a more objective measurement of candidates. With that measurement they did not endorse four of the nine sitting council members, including three of the Republican incumbents.
The biggest surprise was the additional editorial the paper included saying which three incumbent candidates should "move on." Leslie Ghiz, Charlie Winburn, and Cecil Thomas all were called out as being "distractions." All three were candidates the Enquirer previously endorsed in 2009, something they allude to in the article. Calling out candidates in that manner is new and we'll see how effective it is in changing voter's views.
This year I don't see this (or any) endorsement as a game changer, but it will help add some critical votes to those either hoping to sneak into the number 9 spot or want to climb as high as they can in the vote count to help them make a case for a possible appointment to council when someone steps down.
Roxanne Qualls
Amy Murray
Kevin Flynn
Chris Bortz
Laure Quinlivan
Wendell Young
Catherine Smith Mills
Chris Seelbach
Yvette Simpson
Three Dems, two Republicans, four Charterites (including two cross-endorsed as Dems.) That is a whole sale change of government, leaning back to the left from the current council. That's impressive for the traditionally Mainstream Republican editorial board on the Enquirer. I think they changed the process a bit this year, creating a more objective measurement of candidates. With that measurement they did not endorse four of the nine sitting council members, including three of the Republican incumbents.
The biggest surprise was the additional editorial the paper included saying which three incumbent candidates should "move on." Leslie Ghiz, Charlie Winburn, and Cecil Thomas all were called out as being "distractions." All three were candidates the Enquirer previously endorsed in 2009, something they allude to in the article. Calling out candidates in that manner is new and we'll see how effective it is in changing voter's views.
This year I don't see this (or any) endorsement as a game changer, but it will help add some critical votes to those either hoping to sneak into the number 9 spot or want to climb as high as they can in the vote count to help them make a case for a possible appointment to council when someone steps down.
Saturday, October 29, 2011
Friday, October 28, 2011
Complaint Filed With OEC Charging COAST With Misleading Voters
Cincinnatians For Progress has filed a complaint with the Ohio Elections Commission charging that COAST has knowingly made false statements to affect the outcome of the Issue 48 election vote. 20 instances are cited as violations of Ohio Revised Code Section 3517.22. These false statements have included claims that the city has taken funds away from fire services to fund the streetcar project, which is a blatantly obvious lie.
I am curious if the compliant can be amended to include Chris Smitherman who is also misleading voters about Issue 48 on his Facebook page, as documented by CityBeat.
I am curious if the compliant can be amended to include Chris Smitherman who is also misleading voters about Issue 48 on his Facebook page, as documented by CityBeat.
FOP Endorsements Officially Announced
The Enquirer was finally provided with an official list of candidates for Cincinnati City Council getting endorsements from the Fraternal Order of Police of Cincinnati (Local Police Union). Another short list has been issued and it is filled with surprises. The List:
Mike Allen
Kevin Flynn
Leslie Ghiz
Amy Murray
Jason Riveiro
Christopher Smitherman
Charlie Winburn
The big shock is the inclusion of Chris Smitherman, which I wrote about before. The other surprises include the absence of Wayne Lippert and Chris Bortz. I am guessing the lack of support against Issue 2 led to Lippert's Snub. Bortz likely wouldn't take a pledge not to lay off police. He's not made any statements stating he supports cuts, but pledges for Republican leading organizations seems to be the norm.
Flynn and Riverio are surprises to me, but good ones. It is good seeing some variation from just Republicans getting support from the FOP.
Mike Allen isn't a surprise, but as I wrote before is a disappointment. Allen settled a sexual harrassment suit from a former staffer who worked for him while he was the Hamilton County Prosecutor. Yes, the man responsible for prosecuting criminal charges in the county settled a law suit which as its basis argued that he abused his power while in public office. This goes against what the purpose of the police. It is so very disappointing that the FOP will look past this egregious fact because Allen will do what ever they want. A Faustian bargain, but in this case I don't know who is playing the role of the devil.
Mike Allen
Kevin Flynn
Leslie Ghiz
Amy Murray
Jason Riveiro
Christopher Smitherman
Charlie Winburn
The big shock is the inclusion of Chris Smitherman, which I wrote about before. The other surprises include the absence of Wayne Lippert and Chris Bortz. I am guessing the lack of support against Issue 2 led to Lippert's Snub. Bortz likely wouldn't take a pledge not to lay off police. He's not made any statements stating he supports cuts, but pledges for Republican leading organizations seems to be the norm.
Flynn and Riverio are surprises to me, but good ones. It is good seeing some variation from just Republicans getting support from the FOP.
Mike Allen isn't a surprise, but as I wrote before is a disappointment. Allen settled a sexual harrassment suit from a former staffer who worked for him while he was the Hamilton County Prosecutor. Yes, the man responsible for prosecuting criminal charges in the county settled a law suit which as its basis argued that he abused his power while in public office. This goes against what the purpose of the police. It is so very disappointing that the FOP will look past this egregious fact because Allen will do what ever they want. A Faustian bargain, but in this case I don't know who is playing the role of the devil.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)