The Enquirer's Jane Prendergast has a blog post that discusses Cincinnati Council Member Chris Bortz stating he is tired of 'Democrats' saying he and the 'other side' don't have a plan to balance the budget. Jane then outlines a list of steps from Bortz that would cut half of the $33 million city budget deficit.
I hate to point out the obvious and I don't have any other way to say this but: half a plan is no budget plan at all. If Joey Votto hit the ball half way to the fence at GABP and wanted to call it a home run, I think everyone, including Bortz, would call that a joke.
Leslie Ghiz said Republicans have a plan, or at least are working on one. Bortz is not endorsed by the Republicans, but has been voting with that 'side' on budget issues, so whether these are the same issues Ghiz is taking about, then Ghiz has no more of a plan than Bortz. She should keep working on it. I thought Amy Murray, Charlie Winburn, and Wayne Lippert were spending the August recess working on issues like the budget, no?
The bottom line is a simple number: zero. The budget deficit has to be zero after cuts are made. I can't find anyone who thinks that both unfilled budget jobs and current staff working must be eliminated from the 2012 budget to reach the legally mandated zero number. If Chris Bortz or Leslie Ghiz can make those staff cuts without cutting police or the fire department, then that means they are cutting some other departments, heavily, reducing city services. The details on that should be made public an put forth now. In case anyone forgot, Cincinnati is having an election and voters should know where the candidates stand and what services they would cut to balance the budget if elected (or re-elected). That kind of knowledge is something that means candidates have to make political choices. They have to either take on the FOP or be their shill. It is a crappy choice, but that is the box the FOP and it's supporters have forced the Republicans and Bortz into and I for one am not going to give them a pass on making that choice.
Thursday, September 01, 2011
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
What Type of Math is Joe Deters Using?
The County Department heads, including County Prosecutor Joe Deters, issued a report of what they state will happen if cuts are made to the county budget. The results are not good, but Joe Deters seems to be using some type of new math or really has a internally top heavy salary range and high overhead. I say this because he claimed that if he had to bear $1.9M of cuts of his $10.4M budget, he will have to cut 50 of his criminal attorneys. The Enquirer reports that 50 is 41% of his staff attorneys. That works out to an 18% budget cut, which Deters claims equates to a 41% cut to his number of attorneys? What the hell kind of cut is he making to his staff? Is he just picking the 50 lowest paid attorneys and staff and laying them off? The average cost comes out to $38,000 for 50. That's expense for the employees, not salary. Salary would have be something much, less. I don't know what the starting wage is for a county lawyer, but something in the low 30K seems really low.
I am guessing that 50 would include attorneys and support staff combined and it doesn't include expenses for benefits.
Therefore, either Deters is lying, or the Enquirer is mistaken, or both.
This is disappointing because the County is in horrible shape and the Republican majority is not willing to do anything to prevent these types of cuts. Reports like these issued by the department heads are helpful to the public understand the type of impact we face because of the failure of Hartmann and Monzel to maintain the services required by the state. It would help department heads' cause if Deters would be more straight forward with the facts.
UPDATE: Yeah, someone is not adding correctly. If you read page 41 of the impact statement you find that the very half-assed report from the Prosecutor's office assumes $3M in cuts and base 50 attorneys at $50K, plus 10K for benefits, totaling $60K each. So, the question is where does the $3M vs. $1.9M of cuts discrepancy come from? A million+ dollar difference is a big one.
I am guessing that 50 would include attorneys and support staff combined and it doesn't include expenses for benefits.
Therefore, either Deters is lying, or the Enquirer is mistaken, or both.
This is disappointing because the County is in horrible shape and the Republican majority is not willing to do anything to prevent these types of cuts. Reports like these issued by the department heads are helpful to the public understand the type of impact we face because of the failure of Hartmann and Monzel to maintain the services required by the state. It would help department heads' cause if Deters would be more straight forward with the facts.
UPDATE: Yeah, someone is not adding correctly. If you read page 41 of the impact statement you find that the very half-assed report from the Prosecutor's office assumes $3M in cuts and base 50 attorneys at $50K, plus 10K for benefits, totaling $60K each. So, the question is where does the $3M vs. $1.9M of cuts discrepancy come from? A million+ dollar difference is a big one.
Labels:
Government,
Politics
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
CincyFringe Shows Get Noticed Across the Country
CityBeat's Rick Pender reports on the good review the Performance Gallery's IndyFringe performance of Fricative received. The show is a provocative Dadaesque use of vocalisation that played CincyFringe in 2008. Here was my Review on TheConveyor.com.
Also getting some attention for the upcoming Chicago Fringe is Pones Inc whose production The Four Food Groups was the featured photo for this UpChicago Fringe article.
Chicago Fringe also features the amazing Artemis Exchange show Aberrant Reflections on the Barbarism of You & I.
If you happen to be in Chicago over the next week and a half, see both shows, they both were Conveyor.com award winners and are rousing fun.
Also getting some attention for the upcoming Chicago Fringe is Pones Inc whose production The Four Food Groups was the featured photo for this UpChicago Fringe article.
Chicago Fringe also features the amazing Artemis Exchange show Aberrant Reflections on the Barbarism of You & I.
If you happen to be in Chicago over the next week and a half, see both shows, they both were Conveyor.com award winners and are rousing fun.
Labels:
Arts,
CincyFringe,
Theatre
Monday, August 29, 2011
Bigotry Wins a Battle in a Local Catholic High School
It is sad, but not a surprise that the Cincinnati Archdiocese bowed to local and national pressure from anti-Muslim groups and parents. Archbishop Dennis Schnurr cancelled a potluck dinner at Mother of Mercy High School in Westwood between students and local Muslims. The dinner was to be Ramadan meal and was meant as a way for students to learn about and meet local Muslims in hopes to better understanding the religion and the people who practice it. Instead, the event at the school was cancelled and a different Catholic group in University Heights will hold the event, without the school's involvement.
Teaching that bigotry wins is the result of this incident. That will create more bigotry. What is worse is that some parents, like Kelly Jennings, are teaching bigotry directly by acting to prevent this event. I just don't understand the fear and ignorance of fools like Jennings. They appear to live in bubble, with just a single tube of information flowing in and scared stiff that adding more sources will pop their mythical safety net. This lingering bigotry is so foolish, yet so hard to break.
Teaching that bigotry wins is the result of this incident. That will create more bigotry. What is worse is that some parents, like Kelly Jennings, are teaching bigotry directly by acting to prevent this event. I just don't understand the fear and ignorance of fools like Jennings. They appear to live in bubble, with just a single tube of information flowing in and scared stiff that adding more sources will pop their mythical safety net. This lingering bigotry is so foolish, yet so hard to break.
Labels:
Religion (or lack there of)
Where Is the Conservatives' Budget Plan?
Leslie Ghiz said there was going to be a budget plan, but we still haven't gotten word of one. We get more grandstanding and pandering by the Conservatives on Cincinnati City Council, but no plan. It is a pathetic game. Promise not to fire police officers, but refuse to document and detail whose jobs would be cut is all we get.
Let's be clear, jobs will have to be cut based on current State cuts and the continued low revenue projections. The Conservatives (mostly Republican) on council have the majority and have the responsibility to state before the election what they would cut.
We're not going to get much more than promises made to score endorsements and votes. Elections don't breed honesty, they are about saying what your voting base wants to hear.
Let's be clear, jobs will have to be cut based on current State cuts and the continued low revenue projections. The Conservatives (mostly Republican) on council have the majority and have the responsibility to state before the election what they would cut.
We're not going to get much more than promises made to score endorsements and votes. Elections don't breed honesty, they are about saying what your voting base wants to hear.
Labels:
Government,
Politics
Saturday, August 27, 2011
Check Out Some Great Aerial Photos of Cincinnati
Check out some great aerial photographs of Cincinnati, including Downtown, the Rverfront, and Kings Island, from QueenCityDiscovery.
Labels:
Local Blogs
Friday, August 26, 2011
Here They Are: AMERICA'S MERCURY ASTRONAUTS!
There are a few Cincinnati City Council candidates who need their signatures verified, but everything's been turned in and the list of candidates for the ride of a lifetime are as follows:
Incumbents:
Chris Bortz (C)
Leslie Ghiz (R)
Wayne Lippert Jr. (R)
Amy Murray (R)
Roxanne Qualls (C/D)
Laure Quinlivan (D)
Cecil Thomas (D)
Charlie Winburn (R)
Wendell Young (D)
Previous Candidates:
Kevin Flynn (C)
Nicholas Hollan (D)
Christopher Smitherman (I)
New Candidates:
Jacqueline Allen (I) *
Mike Allen (I)
Kathy Atkinson (I)
Patricia McCollum (I)
Sandra Queen Noble (I)
Jason Riveiro (D)
Chris Seelbach (D)
Yvette Simpson (C/D)
P.G. Sittenfeld (D)
Catherine Smith Mills (R)
Write in Candidate:
Orlando Welborn
More from CityBeat and the Enquirer.
*Please note that CityBeat and the Enquirer have slightly different lists. CityBeat includes Jacqueline Allen, the Enquirer does not. CityBeat indicated J. Allen had turned in enough signatures, but was among those waiting for the signatures to be verified. I am not aware that the verification were completed.
Incumbents:
Chris Bortz (C)
Leslie Ghiz (R)
Wayne Lippert Jr. (R)
Amy Murray (R)
Roxanne Qualls (C/D)
Laure Quinlivan (D)
Cecil Thomas (D)
Charlie Winburn (R)
Wendell Young (D)
Previous Candidates:
Kevin Flynn (C)
Nicholas Hollan (D)
Christopher Smitherman (I)
New Candidates:
Jacqueline Allen (I) *
Mike Allen (I)
Kathy Atkinson (I)
Patricia McCollum (I)
Sandra Queen Noble (I)
Jason Riveiro (D)
Chris Seelbach (D)
Yvette Simpson (C/D)
P.G. Sittenfeld (D)
Catherine Smith Mills (R)
Write in Candidate:
Orlando Welborn
More from CityBeat and the Enquirer.
*Please note that CityBeat and the Enquirer have slightly different lists. CityBeat includes Jacqueline Allen, the Enquirer does not. CityBeat indicated J. Allen had turned in enough signatures, but was among those waiting for the signatures to be verified. I am not aware that the verification were completed.
Labels:
Politics
Thursday, August 25, 2011
Help the Streetcar and All Rail Projects: Cincinnatians For Progress Fundraiser - Tonight!
Cincinnatians For Progress is holding a fundraiser tonight,Thursday August 25th, from 5:30-7:30 p.m. at The Blue Wisp, 318 E. 8th St.
There will be music by Dave Hawkins. There will be door prizes from Milton's, Iris Bookcafe, Park + Vine, Segway and others. Get there and support progress for Cincinnati.
A suggested donation is $20 to the general public, or $50 to hosts. If you can't make it tonight, you can contribute online here.
A suggested donation is $20 to the general public, or $50 to hosts. If you can't make it tonight, you can contribute online here.
Labels:
Politics,
Streetcar,
Transportation
Chabot Hates Open Meetings and is Ignorant About Tax Rates
In case you missed the video, check out what happened when Republican Congressman Steve Chabot's staff directed a Cincinnati police officer to seize cameras of private citizens during a Chabot Town Hall event in Avondale at a publicly owned building.
I feel sorry for the police officer, but he should know better, and should have questioned the validity of "security reasons" when two television station cameras are there. Here is a tape of this from a third camera:
Here is more from the Enquirer's political blog. (If this was Steve Driehaus, this would have been front page news).
In other Chabot News, Steve Benen of Washington Monthly has a great story discussing an exchange, at I believe the same meeting above, where Chabot was advised that Federal Tax rates are the lowest they have been in 50 years.Chabot didn't believe it. He was told this by a voter, not likely one to vote for him, but a voter none-the-less. Benen gives Chabot-the-Ignorant the truth about Federal Tax rates. I understand that in the middle of a meeting, Chabot can't Google this, but as a member of Congress who is talking about tax policy, he should know this simple fact. What I fear is that he knows this, as do most Republican office holders, but he doesn't want any else to know this. They want people to think they pay far more taxes then ever before in hopes that the ignorant public will support cutting taxes, without a worry about how much their lives will change when they are asked to buy why they can't afford, assuming they want the same service the government provided. Republicans like Chabot want to destroy more government services for the public and will lie in order to do so. That's the modern GOP way.
I feel sorry for the police officer, but he should know better, and should have questioned the validity of "security reasons" when two television station cameras are there. Here is a tape of this from a third camera:
Here is more from the Enquirer's political blog. (If this was Steve Driehaus, this would have been front page news).
In other Chabot News, Steve Benen of Washington Monthly has a great story discussing an exchange, at I believe the same meeting above, where Chabot was advised that Federal Tax rates are the lowest they have been in 50 years.Chabot didn't believe it. He was told this by a voter, not likely one to vote for him, but a voter none-the-less. Benen gives Chabot-the-Ignorant the truth about Federal Tax rates. I understand that in the middle of a meeting, Chabot can't Google this, but as a member of Congress who is talking about tax policy, he should know this simple fact. What I fear is that he knows this, as do most Republican office holders, but he doesn't want any else to know this. They want people to think they pay far more taxes then ever before in hopes that the ignorant public will support cutting taxes, without a worry about how much their lives will change when they are asked to buy why they can't afford, assuming they want the same service the government provided. Republicans like Chabot want to destroy more government services for the public and will lie in order to do so. That's the modern GOP way.
Labels:
Politics
The System Works! No Thanks to Republicans on Council
So, no laws had to be changed. No, arms had to be twisted. Instead, the Republicans Grandstanding on a non-issue just needed to waste some time. None of that mattered. The Oakley Skyline Chile Restaurant has approval to expand as it wanted. If you hear any of the Republicans taking credit, ask them to explain what they did, exactly, to get his done. If they don't have anything beyond a B.S. answer, then you can figure out what stinks. If you can't smell what they say, then you have your nose up someone's behind.
Labels:
Politics
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
Dear Chief Craig, Deters Is an Ignorant Political Hack
Cincinnati Police Chief James Craig was on WDBZ radio recently and reportedly was troubled by the comments made by Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters. I can help Chief Craig here by telling him that Deters is a Republican who gets elected by making people in Hamilton County, mostly Republicans, scared of the City and of black people specifically. That's what he does. He's subtle about it, but he does it on purpose. Case in point is Deter's ignorant comments about the incident on Fountain Square, where he compared it to Times Square and claimed "It's had one gun crime in the last three years..."
Well, let me help some more and do a quick Google Search on the topic:
1. April 5, 2010: 4 Shot, 54 Arrested in Times Square Easter Melee
1. April 5, 2010: 4 Shot, 54 Arrested in Times Square Easter Melee
2. December 10, 2009: Cop kills man in Times Square shootout
3. May 1, 2010: Car Bombing Attempt
4. January 7, 2011: Journalist Found Murdered in Times Square Hotel Room
5. August 21, 2010: Police investigate fatal stabbing near Times Square
6. August 12, 2010: Wizard of Oz Character Stabs Man in Times Square
7. July 17, 2011: Attempted Rape on Time Square
So, after a really quick search, I found two incidents of gun crimes (five dead), one almost tragic terrorist attempt, two fatal stabbings, one non-fatal stabbing, and one attempted rape. All of these happened with the last three years. This is by no means a complete list, just a quick Google Search. So, yes, Joe Deters is full of shit. Times Square is a relatively safe place, far safer than it used to be. I somehow survived walking with my high school classmates through Time Square in 1989 back in the old scary days, and lived to tell about it. Time Square is still far more dangerous that Fountain Square has been or will ever be. You can't find how many muggings or thefts in the news in NYC because those don't make the news. Here in Cincinnati, sometimes it makes the news, on slow news days or when the victim makes for good pictures.
Bottom line, Deters makes stuff up to gain attention and make people scared of the City and Downtown specifically. He does so, in my opinion, to make people scared and more open to his brand of fear politics. Thankfully, I've not seen this from other Republicans in the same manner. I'm still waiting for the next council meeting, where I hope it is not used as a political weapon. Having a police chief that is willing to not ignore the comments of people like Deters and is willing to call them on it is a refreshing spirit that I hopes continues.
Labels:
Police-Crime-Law,
Politics
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Around the Blogs Recently: Things you Might Have Missed
CinAwesome! may have found the cultural incubator that keeps producing douchebags.
Carrie Bradshaw is full of shit stirs up the dating world with a summary of a recent two date night that came up empty.
McCoy on Movies has a take on Ann Hathaway's new movie One Day. Editor's note: I, for the record, find Hathaway hot, but maybe not this movie, so much.
Carrie Bradshaw is full of shit stirs up the dating world with a summary of a recent two date night that came up empty.
McCoy on Movies has a take on Ann Hathaway's new movie One Day. Editor's note: I, for the record, find Hathaway hot, but maybe not this movie, so much.
Labels:
Local Blogs
Monday, August 22, 2011
False Perceptions Are Fueled By the Media, and Build Walls
The events Friday and Saturday are tragic events, but the lingering tragedy is in the fuel that burns the false impressions into the minds of ignorant people from the media coverage of these events. No, there's nothing false about the news, but it's the intensity given the story. The articles are going out of their way to give the truth about crime rates and the exceptions that these incidents represent, but people like Joe Deters are using it and will use it to build fear. All they need are the images and the words describing what happened. The headlines and the pictures are what linger in the minds of the average Joe-Q-Public. When there are three or four different headlines about the same story, an extra importance is perceived.
This results in the false perception of the city and of Downtown. It strengthens the bigotry of some and it puts doubt in the fickled ignorant, who consume news as if they are window shopping for shoes. This is a cultural state that is plaguing the public and I don't know any type of solution, short of driving around every cul-de-sac and neighborhood in the tri-state area, shouting slogans on a megaphone. That still wouldn't get the truth into minds who don't want to know anything that isn't easy and familiar.
What I am bracing myself for is the political onslaught of fear mongering. There was some from Deters in the article above. He's done it so many times I think everyone expects the same and they get the ignorance he puts out, like his ignorance on Times Square crime rates. (Hat Tip to CincyCapell).
What I am really hoping we don't get are Council Candidates using this as political fodder. I encourage council members and candidates issuing comments that are introspective or positive. We need to work together to prevent crime and we need to make people understand that our city is safe. We don't need council candidates claiming this is any type of indication or example of something that should drive future action of government. Here the system worked. No more or no fewer police officers were going to prevent a person from carrying a gun illegally in a public place. It is tragic that a 16 year old put himself into this situation. I also really hope that the police actions are allowed to be reviewed, but not used as a tool to build hate. If there are questions, they can be asked. We don't need to push fear of the police. I am looking right squarely at Chris Smitherman on this. I hope he does not play politics with these incidents. Instead I really hope he helps people understand what happened, not assume they know what happened and create more false perceptions. False impressions build walls. Many of us have tried to tear down all of the walls that separate us into conflicting factions. It is the duty of all public officials, and those trying to become public officials, to help keep those walls down and create open spaces were people and their cultures can freely blend with all others.
This results in the false perception of the city and of Downtown. It strengthens the bigotry of some and it puts doubt in the fickled ignorant, who consume news as if they are window shopping for shoes. This is a cultural state that is plaguing the public and I don't know any type of solution, short of driving around every cul-de-sac and neighborhood in the tri-state area, shouting slogans on a megaphone. That still wouldn't get the truth into minds who don't want to know anything that isn't easy and familiar.
What I am bracing myself for is the political onslaught of fear mongering. There was some from Deters in the article above. He's done it so many times I think everyone expects the same and they get the ignorance he puts out, like his ignorance on Times Square crime rates. (Hat Tip to CincyCapell).
What I am really hoping we don't get are Council Candidates using this as political fodder. I encourage council members and candidates issuing comments that are introspective or positive. We need to work together to prevent crime and we need to make people understand that our city is safe. We don't need council candidates claiming this is any type of indication or example of something that should drive future action of government. Here the system worked. No more or no fewer police officers were going to prevent a person from carrying a gun illegally in a public place. It is tragic that a 16 year old put himself into this situation. I also really hope that the police actions are allowed to be reviewed, but not used as a tool to build hate. If there are questions, they can be asked. We don't need to push fear of the police. I am looking right squarely at Chris Smitherman on this. I hope he does not play politics with these incidents. Instead I really hope he helps people understand what happened, not assume they know what happened and create more false perceptions. False impressions build walls. Many of us have tried to tear down all of the walls that separate us into conflicting factions. It is the duty of all public officials, and those trying to become public officials, to help keep those walls down and create open spaces were people and their cultures can freely blend with all others.
Labels:
Downtown,
Fountain Square,
Police-Crime-Law,
Politics,
Race
Friday, August 19, 2011
Republican Council Members Are Exploiting Tragedy
A Cincinnati police officer was on his way to work recently and was very seriously injured in a car accident on Columbia Parkway on the East side of the City. This is a terrible tragedy and I believe everyone wishes him a speedy recovery. Four members of Cincinnati City Council hold a press conference, along the side of the road, calling for a study of that road. They don't say how they would pay for such a study or pay for improvements to the road. They don't say why this incident is more important than other car or pedestrian or bicycle accidents that happen during their terms on different roads in throughout the city.
The fact that they held the press conference along the side of the road, likely caused enough commotion that they are lucky they did not cause another accident during the presser.
This accident happened to occur to a Police Officer. That means it will get media attention and get the attention of the type of voter that listens to the FOP (police union) when it makes endorsements for city council. This grandstanding event is designed not to improve road safety, but to increase the voter tallies for Ghiz, Murrary, Lippert, and Bortz (the Charterite of the group). That's explotation, but that is politics and these members are playing politics like conjoined quadruplets.
A functioning mainstream media needs to rip them a new on this issue the same way Kevin Osborne did on the Oakley Skyline faux controversy. Since we live in a culture where criticism of any perceived to be helping a police officer injured, we will not get much. The WLWT article linked about had some hints of reporting when they asked ODOT. Now they need to just dig further and find out how dangerous this road is considered as opposed to other roads. I've driven on it and I have driven on Glenway and Queensgate on the West side. Couldn't they be holding the same press conference over there?
UPDATE: It appears the mainstream media, the Enquirer specifically, did rip them a new one, and handed it to them. It is too bad that more people will watch the TV news clip and not read the article.
UDATE #2: You might ask three of the four (Ghiz, Lippert, Murray) if they oppose COAST's anti-rail issue. That issue would make it impossible to have any passenger rail transportation until well into the next decade. Rail transportation along Riverside/Eastern Avenues would help reduce traffic on Columbia parkway thus taking away at least one factor that increases accidents.
The fact that they held the press conference along the side of the road, likely caused enough commotion that they are lucky they did not cause another accident during the presser.
This accident happened to occur to a Police Officer. That means it will get media attention and get the attention of the type of voter that listens to the FOP (police union) when it makes endorsements for city council. This grandstanding event is designed not to improve road safety, but to increase the voter tallies for Ghiz, Murrary, Lippert, and Bortz (the Charterite of the group). That's explotation, but that is politics and these members are playing politics like conjoined quadruplets.
A functioning mainstream media needs to rip them a new on this issue the same way Kevin Osborne did on the Oakley Skyline faux controversy. Since we live in a culture where criticism of any perceived to be helping a police officer injured, we will not get much. The WLWT article linked about had some hints of reporting when they asked ODOT. Now they need to just dig further and find out how dangerous this road is considered as opposed to other roads. I've driven on it and I have driven on Glenway and Queensgate on the West side. Couldn't they be holding the same press conference over there?
UPDATE: It appears the mainstream media, the Enquirer specifically, did rip them a new one, and handed it to them. It is too bad that more people will watch the TV news clip and not read the article.
UDATE #2: You might ask three of the four (Ghiz, Lippert, Murray) if they oppose COAST's anti-rail issue. That issue would make it impossible to have any passenger rail transportation until well into the next decade. Rail transportation along Riverside/Eastern Avenues would help reduce traffic on Columbia parkway thus taking away at least one factor that increases accidents.
Thursday, August 18, 2011
The Number of City Council Candidates Is Growing
Joe Wessels has a great article reporting on who is officially on the ballot for the Cincinnati City Council election and who among the declared candidates are still working on getting on the ballot.
The big news is that we officially have more than one nutty candidate running (other than Smitherman). Life would boring without conspiracy spouting political candidates. The additional person, who is no stranger to the tin foil hat community is Sandra Queen Noble. "Queen" is joined by 1 official write-in candidate Orlando Welborn, who will not appear on the ballot, but his write-in votes will be counted. Good luck on that.
Other possible candidates, none of whom I've heard of, are:
Jacqueline Allen
Kathy Atkinson
Patricia McCollum
Joe also lists out a group who have taken out petitions, but have yet to turn in any signatures. I'll not mention any of them out of a semblance of respect, except for Theo Barnes, who is on the list and who has been a candidate for council before. I'm not surprised to see him back and he could be in the lead for last place, even with a write-in candidate in the mix.
So, this puts us to maybe a list of 23 running for council, counting the write in candidate and assuming none of they-who-shall-not-yet-be-named actually get their act together. I will predict, for no apparent reason that we will see 21 candidates listed on the ballot, not counting the write-ins.
The big news is that we officially have more than one nutty candidate running (other than Smitherman). Life would boring without conspiracy spouting political candidates. The additional person, who is no stranger to the tin foil hat community is Sandra Queen Noble. "Queen" is joined by 1 official write-in candidate Orlando Welborn, who will not appear on the ballot, but his write-in votes will be counted. Good luck on that.
Other possible candidates, none of whom I've heard of, are:
Jacqueline Allen
Kathy Atkinson
Patricia McCollum
Joe also lists out a group who have taken out petitions, but have yet to turn in any signatures. I'll not mention any of them out of a semblance of respect, except for Theo Barnes, who is on the list and who has been a candidate for council before. I'm not surprised to see him back and he could be in the lead for last place, even with a write-in candidate in the mix.
So, this puts us to maybe a list of 23 running for council, counting the write in candidate and assuming none of they-who-shall-not-yet-be-named actually get their act together. I will predict, for no apparent reason that we will see 21 candidates listed on the ballot, not counting the write-ins.
Labels:
Politics
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Lippert Is Carrying COAST's Water
When Councilman Wayne Lippert issues a press release demanding that all work on the Streetcar be stopped until the Anti-Rail issue on the ballot in November is voted on, he is helping COAST and its anti-city efforts. The question that will persist about Lippert: Does he support COAST and it's anti-city efforts?This press release goes along way in supporting COAST. In my views it does the following:
What makes this on the surface laughable, is that if you use Lippert's logic, the City, County, and State should not take any action, spend any money, have any discussion of anything that will be affected by a ballot initiative. That therefore means that since we have a statewide ballot issue (anti-healthcare law effort) that will decide if Ohio will knowingly violate constitutional law (supremacy clause) , we should avoid following the U.S. Constitution or any federal laws until the voters speak. Oh, Lippert didn't mention that one in his press release? Hmmm, I wonder why.
- It legitimized COAST's extreme anti-rail effort.
- If signals to COAST voters that Lippert is in full support of the anti-rail issue without having to say it. He may not be in support of the issue, but wants COAST voters to think he is. Tea Party money may be politically toxic to anyone who cares about the City, but it is still green.
- It gives more free press to COAST and Co.
- This solidifies Lippert as desperate to get every far right wing vote he can. He's lost any hope of getting moderate voters that are not just closet Republicans.
- This confirms to me that Lippert is looking not to help the city, but is laying the groundwork to run for higher office and will do so by pushing the agenda he thinks will get him elected at that later time, not what will improve the city. He wants to appease conservative base voters and they are in the suburbs and not in the city.
What makes this on the surface laughable, is that if you use Lippert's logic, the City, County, and State should not take any action, spend any money, have any discussion of anything that will be affected by a ballot initiative. That therefore means that since we have a statewide ballot issue (anti-healthcare law effort) that will decide if Ohio will knowingly violate constitutional law (supremacy clause) , we should avoid following the U.S. Constitution or any federal laws until the voters speak. Oh, Lippert didn't mention that one in his press release? Hmmm, I wonder why.
Labels:
Politics,
Streetcar,
Transportation
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
MidPoint Schedule Released
In case you still living in a cave, you should know that the 2011 (Tenth annual) Midpoint Music Festival Schedule and line-up was announced. This year there are some new interesting add-ons and what caught my eye was the MidPoint Midway that will close off part of 12 Street and include an Artworks box truck project which sounds very interesting.
For the full details, including the venue listing and showcase times, check out mpmf.com.
For the full details, including the venue listing and showcase times, check out mpmf.com.
Labels:
Arts,
Local Music,
MidPoint,
Over-the-Rhine
SPAETHC Provides Analysis of the CBD Grocery Shopping Options
SPAETHC from Cincyvoices does some research and provides an analysis of the grocery options in the central business district, aka Downtown. He purposely leaves out OTR, which has a small Kroger's and Findley Market.
He brings to mind a big question: how far away is a grocery store away from a non-downtown resident? The Newport Kroger and the Corryville Kroger are 5 to 10 minutes away by car. Is that not how long it would take for most people in Hyde Park, Oakley, and Mt. Lookout to get to the Hyde Park Kroger?
He brings to mind a big question: how far away is a grocery store away from a non-downtown resident? The Newport Kroger and the Corryville Kroger are 5 to 10 minutes away by car. Is that not how long it would take for most people in Hyde Park, Oakley, and Mt. Lookout to get to the Hyde Park Kroger?
Labels:
Downtown
Friday, August 12, 2011
Republican Council Members Appease Business Owners, Ignore Public Good
If you left the Republicans on council with total control of the city government, they would let businesses do what ever they want. Instead of discussing why the city law requires what it does, they just attack a city department for DOING ITS JOB. We have a building code. We have a government that enforces that building code. We have a process in place that allows for business owners to appeal or seek exemption from the building code. That is how it works, and has worked well for a long time.
If Ghiz, Lippert and Murray seek to end the building code or the means to enforce it, then they are setting up business owners for long term failure when disaster or crime strikes. Yes, those are reasons for the building code. We have building standards that help buildings during disasters and help prevent massive damage and loss of life in those types of disasters. We, as a society, need building codes to exists because if another building on my block catches fire, my building could catch on fire. We need the building codes to require businesses and building owners keep standards that will help the WHOLE community in times when we need to work together.
If the Republicans want to improve the process for appeals or exemptions, then they could draft legislation to make it happen, unless there are State requirements that they must look to Columbus to address. We don't get that from this effort. Instead we get sound bites that place business as the 'victim' to an evil government, something that appeals to the ignorant fools who think that government is bad, except for the police and fire departments and roads and health inspectors and all of the other services they use. I guess having logic only a mother could love, is better than no logic, but it makes for bad public policy.
Attacking government departments for doing their job is a typical type of grandstanding, but a specialty for Republicans, with Ghiz as it's primary champion on Council. With a press conference you would think the media would ask questions and print answers that question what laws Ghiz & Co. want to change, why Ghiz & Co. would make a spectacle of this issue instead of making motions in a council session to address the issue, and why Ghiz & Co. are using this a political issue instead of acting on it? No we don't get that, we get accomplices for the appeasement of business interests. Business owners give more to Republicans in Cincinnati and business owners buy commercials from the media. Walking a fine line is what makes reporting here extra fluff and no meat.
If Ghiz, Lippert and Murray seek to end the building code or the means to enforce it, then they are setting up business owners for long term failure when disaster or crime strikes. Yes, those are reasons for the building code. We have building standards that help buildings during disasters and help prevent massive damage and loss of life in those types of disasters. We, as a society, need building codes to exists because if another building on my block catches fire, my building could catch on fire. We need the building codes to require businesses and building owners keep standards that will help the WHOLE community in times when we need to work together.
If the Republicans want to improve the process for appeals or exemptions, then they could draft legislation to make it happen, unless there are State requirements that they must look to Columbus to address. We don't get that from this effort. Instead we get sound bites that place business as the 'victim' to an evil government, something that appeals to the ignorant fools who think that government is bad, except for the police and fire departments and roads and health inspectors and all of the other services they use. I guess having logic only a mother could love, is better than no logic, but it makes for bad public policy.
Attacking government departments for doing their job is a typical type of grandstanding, but a specialty for Republicans, with Ghiz as it's primary champion on Council. With a press conference you would think the media would ask questions and print answers that question what laws Ghiz & Co. want to change, why Ghiz & Co. would make a spectacle of this issue instead of making motions in a council session to address the issue, and why Ghiz & Co. are using this a political issue instead of acting on it? No we don't get that, we get accomplices for the appeasement of business interests. Business owners give more to Republicans in Cincinnati and business owners buy commercials from the media. Walking a fine line is what makes reporting here extra fluff and no meat.
Labels:
Politics
Thursday, August 11, 2011
Updated List Of Who Is Running For Cincinnati City Council
Not everyone running has turned in their required signatures, but here's the latest listing of who is running for Cincinnati City Council:
Incumbents:
Chris Bortz
Leslie Ghiz
Wayne Lippert Jr.
Amy Murray
Roxanne Qualls
Laure Quinlivan
Cecil Thomas
Charlie Winburn
Wendell Young
Previous Candidates:
Kevin Flynn
Nicholas Hollan
Christopher Smitherman
New Candidates:
Jason Riveiro
Chris Seelbach
P.G. Sittenfeld
Catherine Smith Mills
Yvette Simpson
Likely Running:
Mike Allen
At most there appear to only be 18 candidates. Anyone else not listed above who turns in signatures will not be a significant candidate, unless they have more gold than Midas. Later this month the 'official' list will come out. If it looks different than above, I'll be astonished for all of about 43 seconds.
Incumbents:
Chris Bortz
Leslie Ghiz
Wayne Lippert Jr.
Amy Murray
Roxanne Qualls
Laure Quinlivan
Cecil Thomas
Charlie Winburn
Wendell Young
Previous Candidates:
Kevin Flynn
Nicholas Hollan
Christopher Smitherman
New Candidates:
Jason Riveiro
Chris Seelbach
P.G. Sittenfeld
Catherine Smith Mills
Yvette Simpson
Likely Running:
Mike Allen
At most there appear to only be 18 candidates. Anyone else not listed above who turns in signatures will not be a significant candidate, unless they have more gold than Midas. Later this month the 'official' list will come out. If it looks different than above, I'll be astonished for all of about 43 seconds.
Labels:
Politics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)