The
Enquirer went all out today in reporting on the Collins-Allen affair. The headline with
interview based story on Collins. What followed was something that I have never seen from a newspaper,
a story about a person's former tenure with that newspaper. The trifecta is completed with an
acticle foreshadowing possible change with its report about the Hamilton County GOP holding a "Come to Jesus Meeting" with Mike Allen in the near future.
The spin is getting so thick we'll need to dig out the waders. I am amazed at the
Enquirer's article with a headline of "While admired by some at Enquirer, Collins no stranger to office gossip." How better to get gossip in the press than to use it as a self-reflective tool showing one's own humanity. This is a smear, plain and simple.
Some in the newsroom said those efforts made her seem manipulative. Collins acknowledges she was the subject of office gossip, most of which, she says, was ridiculous. But some of that gossip is now of interest to Allen's lawyers, who want to know more about Collins' past relationships and conduct in the workplace.
Of particular interest are any relationships she may have had with supervisors.
If they are rumors, then name names. Don't put Collins out there with hints that she was one to sleep with her bosses to get ahead, without naming those bosses.
No one in the mainstream local media has picked-up with the
Blue Chip Review's story about there being two other women who are or could come forth and claim sexual harassment against Mike Allen. Does Allen have other affairs? What about his days as a police officer? Where are the stories of him back in law school or back in the CPD?
Other interesting side note from the story about Collins' past at the
Enquirer, it notes that Peter Bronson and Mike Allen are or were friends many years ago. Does Nate Livingston's gossip story hold up about the
Enquirer holding back a Bronson column calling for Allen to resign?
